On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:55:56 +0200 Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:56:21 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > >> -distributed with all copies and transcodings of the recording or > >> +distributed with all copies, transformations and adaptations of > >the work or > substantial portions thereof. > > > I'm not sure if this phrasing tries to require that transformations > > and adaptations (a subset of derivative works) be licensed under the > > same license as the original work. > > I cannot see how this is different from how BSD licenses require that > the BSD copyright blurb *itself* is retained with all derivates. > > Everybody seems to agree that this does not make the BSD license > viral, and that a derivor is free to give fewer rights to his part of > the copyright in the derived work than the original BSD author gave to > his part.
Mmmmh, yes, you're right.
OK, so I think that the current proposal is a good license for Debconf
video recordings[1].
[1] even though I'd slightly prefer an unmodified Expat license, in
order to avoid contributing to license proliferation, but oh well...
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpKyoeVcJ0xu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
