MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I concur that it's not a fee[0]. > > [0] I do feel that an individual's private information is effectively > > a valuable property that can be traded at the individual's discretion > > in pieces for other things of value. > > How do you conclude that having to give valuable property to the > licensor is not a fee?
I don't think "fee" should be defined so broadly as to include "obligation to surrender something that could theoretically have a monetary value to someone". -- \ Hercules Grytpype-Thynne: "Well, Neddie, I'm going to be | `\ frank." Ned Seagoon: "Right, I'll be Tom." Count Moriarty: | _o__) "I'll be Gladys." *slap* -- The Goon Show, _World War I_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
