[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>,----
>| Amusingly, it's only the
>| filename and you can probably make an symlink or some other
>| alias while complying with this, so it's more comedy than a bug.
>`----
>
>So here the lesson seems to be that also filename change requirements
>are acceptable as long as they do not impose any "relevant"
>restrictions, with the question what's relevant depending on the
>individual case.
This appears to be similar to the TeX license requirements, which while
being annoying are free.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to