[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> even raised as an example of free licenses in the DFSG. >This is wrong. This http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license >is not 4-clause BSD license, since the obnoxious 3rd clause is removed: This is not relevant, since the advertising clause was removed well after the DFSG was written.
Also, a 3-clause BSD license is usually called "MIT license" (or "X11 license") to remark the difference with the original BSD license. Even if it actually *is* the new BSD license, the file name on www.debian.org is misleading. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
