[Restricting to -legal, feel free to widen the audience if neccessary] Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, the RMs are making claims that those sourceless GPLed drivers don't cause > any kind of distribution problem, while i strongly believe that the GPL clause > saying that all the distribution rights under the GPL are lost if you cannot > abide by all points, including the requirement for sources.
If the copyright holder distributes the material under GPL, I would be surprised that a court would find redistributing that same material under GPL invalid. The copyright holder obviously believes that the hex dump is the "preferred method of modification" in this case - why else would it be distributed under GPL instead of some "no modifications, no redistributions" -license? -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
