Dear All, The licensing of dcraw has recently changed:
A clause concerning the mandatory distribution of source code has been modified with the following footnote added: >If you have not modified dcraw.c in any way, a link to my >homepage qualifies as "full source code". To me, this seems *less* restrictive than the clause without this footnote. It seems that you only need to include a link to the source code (which is already present in the copyright file), and don't need to make the source available. However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case. Thanks, link to source code (containing full license) http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/dcraw.c -- Steve King -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
