jochen georges <[email protected]> wrote: > i send this email on friday, but may be there was a problem. so i send it > again, 'hope it is not impolite.
There was a reply: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/04/msg00137.html [...] > only thing you can't do is fork the original source. [...] > i think, he just wants to avoid that there is "external" code under his > name "clearthought". > > so, what do you say? > is that free? I think it fails DFSG 3. If he wants to avoid external code under his name, then there should be a clear labelling requirement and a trademark on the name "clearthought". Restricting the class and its source seems impractical. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
