saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote: > [...] if it is indeed required that the patent indemnity be > requested then from a patent license perspective, the Mono > implementation should fail Debian Legal's "Desert Island" and > "Dissident" tests for DFSG compliance[5] because upstream must be > contacted and the licensees identified. [...] > [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFSG#debian-legal_tests_for_DFSG_compliance
Oh what a terrible reference! It's a secondary source made from secondary sources. Cite the DFSG FAQ if you must, but this sort of postcardware has been regarded as breaking DFSG 1 for over a decade: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1998/08/msg00920.html Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org