On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:25:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:28:48 +0200 Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > > > dann frazier wrote: > > > A couple of years ago I started a thread about the Intel IA-32 EL License > > > here: > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/04/msg00198.html > [...] > > > Intel seem willing to consider modifications to the wording of the > > > license, so I'd like to try and formulate a list of changes Debian > > > would like to see. > > > > Yes, but the easier method is to look for an other license, already used > > by Intel (for similar tasks) and possibly also used by Debian in main. > > I agree that the best possible solution would to persuade Intel to > re-license in a DFSG-free manner, so that the Debian Project could > include EL in main. > > Dann, do you think there's some chance to do that? > Or have you already reached the conclusion that the best *feasible* > outcome would be a package distributable in the non-free archive?
Yes, I have reached this conclusion :( -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
