Eugen Dedu <[email protected]> writes: > We have a bug report, > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses > of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses > involved are DFSG-free.
Coming back to the start of this thread, it's been pointed out before that *licenses* are not judged against the DFSG; a particular software *work* is so judged. For that, we need to know the full set of applicable license terms on the software. It seems that this information hasn't yet been provided, since multiple “licenses” have been presented so far in this thread. > Could you please tell me if these plugins are allowed to be in debian > main? To help with this, please paste here in this thread the set of license terms for the software work, so that its effect on the freedom of that work can be discussed in context. -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “Well, I think | `\ so, Brain, but ‘apply North Pole’ to what?” —_Pinky and The | _o__) Brain_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
