On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:56:31 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: > Hello, > > While conducting routine reading, I saw that debhelper is released under > the GPL license. Since debhelper includes bits of itself in the package > it manages, does this mean that I cannot use debhelper for packaging > something that would be GPL-incompatible? I know that for fonts, one has > to make exceptions stating that PDF documents embedding GPL fonts are > not covered by the GPL, why should it be different for debhelper? > Files: examples/*, autoscripts/* Copyright: 1997-2008 Joey Hess <[email protected]> Licence: other These files are in the public domain. . Pedants who belive I cannot legally say that code I have written is in the public domain may consider them instead to be licensed as follows: . Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted under any circumstances. No warranty.
What other bits of debhelper are you talking about? Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
