Francesco Poli <[email protected]> writes: > ...and call it by a name other than "GPL"! > > I am under the impression that this is what Ben meant, but I'll wait > for him to clarify.
Right. My point is that it's not helpful to say “modified versions of the GPL” are allowed, since at that point the term “GPL” doesn't apply usefully. Any text can be considered a “modified version of the GPL”, given sufficient modification. Better to simplify that to just “any license terms, given the following conditions:” and be clear on exactly what kinds of license terms are acceptable. -- \ “Too many pieces of music finish too long after the end.” —Igor | `\ Stravinskey | _o__) | Ben Finney
pgpvzk4iwtrX0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
