Gustavo Franco wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:13 PM, MJ Ray <[email protected]> wrote: > > Gustavo Franco wrote: > >> * Btw, if it was the open logo, we're not talking about software. DFSG > >> quote about Derived Works states "original software"; > > > > I feel that's unacceptable - the logo is software, even if it might > > not be a program in some formats. Arguing otherwise would allow all > > manner of unmodifiable rubbish into debian. > > Technically, if you consider a logo is a software itself - where's the > source code? I mean the uncompressed and descriptive formats (SVGs and > friends) that were used to generate the compressed and sometimes lossy > ones (PNG, JPG, ...). [...]
The source code will vary and may sometimes be the file itself. It should be provided in the source tarball, where it exists. This is not a new argument and I don't see it taking us any place new. Sorry, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
