Francesco Poli <[email protected]> writes: > Ben, am I mistaken or is the analyzed license unchanged since the last > time we discussed it? > A wdiff run only spots a copyright year update...
I missed the reference to a previous discussion. My apologies for not reading the message more carefully. > After re-reading the thread, it seems to me that the majority of the > people who participated to that discussion agreed that there were some > issues that made the license unacceptable for main. > > The only new issue that you have just raised is the requirement to > keep a changelog in each file: this issue wasn't spotted during the > Oct 2008 discussion. Thanks for catching it! Glad to help, even if by mistake :-) -- \ “If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you | `\ have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither | _o__) on your side, pound the table.” —anonymous | Ben Finney
pgpshYDKeerHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
