Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > It's true that there's no clear definition of the term "source code" > in the DFSG text, but the most accepted definition of source in the > context of Free Software has been the one found in the GNU GPL, for > quite a long time.
Are you sure it's the most accepted? I didn't find numbers on it. > [...] > > I feel it's a grey area, so if the PS files aren't too difficult to > > reconstruct, I'd still let them stay. > > I instead think that the actual source code (= preferred form for > modifications) should be searched for. Sure, it should be - what happens if it no longer exists? That seems quite possible for a years-old journal paper. Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
