On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 17:41:40 +0200, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Paul Wise wrote: > >Is there any chance they would use an existing license instead of > >reinventing the legal wheel? > > Many of us are arguing that the W3C should do just that with > suggestions to use MIT, BSD or CC0.
I'm glad to hear it! It may be worth mentioning that since 2008, the XMPP Software Foundation has used a MIT-based license for its specifications: <http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xsf-ipr-policy/> S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110428160657.ga12...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk