Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[email protected]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: > >> I have looked at licenses of reverse dependencies, and I did >> found some GPLv2-only packages. That caused me to dual license >> the package instead of going to LGPLv3+. (GPLv2-only and >> LGPLv3+ are incompatible.) I am not aware of any other license >> that could pose any problem with a dual-licensed GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ >> package. > > I believe GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ is incompatible with > GPLv2|OpenSSL-linking-exception, used in ekg2.
Thank you for a good data point. I've brought this up with [email protected] to hear what they have to say about it. /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
