Timo, I'm not sure why a open source license wouldn't work? In any case, here are some comments.
> 2.2. Duties and responsibilities of the Licensee > > Through reasonable means suitable to the distribution medium > or method which is used in conjunction with a product containing > data or a service utilising [sic] data covered by this licence [sic] > or while distributing data, the Licensee shall: > > * mention the name of the Licensor, the name of the dataset(s) > and the timewhen the National Land Survey has delivered the > dataset(s) (e.g.: contains data from the National Land Survey > of Finland Topographic Database 06/2012) > * provide a copy of this licence or a link to it, as well as It seems that these are OK, since these notices could be placed into an "About" box or similar structure? > * require third parties to provide the same information when > granting rights to copies of dataset(s) or products and services > containing such data and This one seems problematic since it would require some sort of license assent mechanism. Perhaps this requirement could be softened to be a conditional, if you require acceptance of your own license, you must require acceptance of this one? > * remove the name of the Licensor from the product or service, if > required to do so by the Licensor. How do you comply with this given the other requirements? Best, Clark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336655243.8135.140661073725377.2c87d...@webmail.messagingengine.com