On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Walter Landry <wlan...@caltech.edu> wrote: > I noticed that parts of the code are licensed under GPL 3+, and other > parts are EPL 1+. These are incompatible licenses, meaning that > Debian could not distribute binaries. One solution would be to put > everything under Expat or MIT. Alternately, you could dual license > everything under GPL 3+ and EPL 1+.
Dual licensing was intended here. I have to update the website. But I think it is clearly explained in the headers and in the file COPYING. The lazyglpk library is dlopening the glpk library, and the same goes for the program lazyglpk-config. My interpretation of the GPL3 says I have to license the binaries that dlopen glpk under the GPL3. As this is independant of the rest of the libraries, I figured I could publish the glpk part under the GPL, and the rest of the libraries under some license compatible with the EPL. I would then link Osi only with the EPL-compatible binaries. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAHLp1Y=mktxbamsuzxqq5ua8iktk5o-3yixehsoo9bwx1jf...@mail.gmail.com
