On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote: >> (b) any amended version of this Program be clearly marked to show the >> nature of the amendment and of the name of the amending organisation, > > ^ IMHO this really fails the The Dissident test. > > I quoth: > > | Consider a dissident in a totalitarian state who wishes to share a > | modified bit of software with fellow dissidents, but does not wish to > | reveal the identity of the modifier, or directly reveal the > | modifications themselves, or even possession of the program, to the > | government. [snip]
The item in question doesn't say which name should be added, nor who the name should be revealed to. The modifier could add a pseudonym instead of the name they are known as by the government and or simply not distribute the program to anyone they do not trust. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6flqefcqmcws-jerijzkz-g5jnfu7-lau+3ddmp58d...@mail.gmail.com
