Hi, On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:13:09PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > - In point 2., clause b) - stating that that you may redistribute > under the terms of the plain GNU GPL - shall NOT apply. In other > words, if you redistribute, you MUST keep the additional permissions > of the LGPL v3 in place. [...]
> When in doubt, talk to us. What we would like to ensure is that the ELPA > code can be used as needed, while providing a strong incentive for > others to contribute their modifications back to the original > development. After thinking about this some more, I guess their fear might be that people modify and redistribute their ELPA library as part of a bigger GPL project. As the LGPL->GPL relicensing seems to be a one-way street, they might understandably think that they will not be able to incorporate those GPL'd modifications into their version. Is this a valid concern and if so, is there some way around it? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
