Il 30/01/2013 13:58, MJ Ray ha scritto:
> Giulio Paci <[email protected]>
>> "Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General Public License be
>> invalid or become invalid, a valid provision is deemed to have been agreed
>> upon which comes closest
>> to what the parties intended commercially. In any case guarantee/warranty
>> shall be limited to gross negligent actions or intended actions or
>> fraudulent concealment."
> [...]
>> What is your opinion about this exception? Is this exception acceptable for
>> a Debian package in main?
>
> I don't think it's more restrictive than what the courts should do and
> what's in the GPL-2 already, so I would accept it, but I'm not 100% sure.
Thank you very much for your reply. It was also my opinion that the exception
is not more restrictive than GPL-2, nevertheless it is confusing (and I am not
a legal).
Is there any way to be 100% sure? I am still waiting for a reply from upstream
on this.
Bests,
Giulio.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
