Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:19:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338203: 73 pkgs contain debhelper maintscript remnant 
(cruft?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 19:03:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 11:03:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EZYl1-0008F5-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:03:47 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
        by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jA8J3iV2001580
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:03:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EZYkx-0006nN-8I
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:03:43 -0500
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:03:42 -0500
To: Debian BTS Submission <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 73 pkgs contain debhelper maintscript remnant (cruft?)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist

I am including a list of 73 packages which happened to be installed on
my laptop which contain a maintscript with the fragment:

  # dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
  # generated by other debhelper scripts.

Maybe this is a debhelper bug?

Both of my packages contain postinst and postrm, only, and generated
entirely by debhelper.  They have sections like:

# Automatically added by dh_installmenu
...
# End automatically added section

Which I think is well done.  But IMHO the section about "debhelper
will replace ... " is indicitive of a bug.

Either that text should be removed, or something should be put in its
place.  Maybe these packages are buggy and need to do some certain
thing, such that debhelper can do that replacement, but they don't do
it?

In any case, I would like to request that lintian includes a check to
ensure that new packages do not contain that text.

Package list follows; 73 out of 1269 (5.8%) installed packages are
affected.

Please Cc: me.

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin

apt
apt-listchanges
apt-show-versions
aptitude
avifile-player
bittornado
ca-certificates
chaksem
checksecurity
clara
dangen
ddclient
debtags
defoma
dhcp3-client
dict-bouvier
dict-gazetteer2k-counties
dict-gazetteer2k-places
dict-gazetteer2k-zips
dpkg-cross
eep24c
electricsheep
elinks
gs-common
gs-gpl
gsfonts
hevea
icebreaker
imagemagick
info2www
jadetex
le
less
libcupsys2
libdevmapper1
libgtk1
libgtk2
libmoe1
libmysqlclient12
libmysqlclient14
libpam-runtime
libpango1
libroken16-kerberos4kth
libruby1
libsensors3
libsndfile0
login
lp-solve
lprng
mailliststat
menu-xdg
moon-buggy-esd
mpg321
ncurses-hexedit
nvram-wakeup
openssh-client
openssh-server
passwd
procps
psfontmgr
sbuild
tetex-base
tetex-bin
timidity
tkinfo
tpconfig
upgrade-system
usbutils
vche
vtgrab
w3c-dtd-xhtml
xfig
xtux-server

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338203-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 21:19:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 13:19:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EZasc-0004nj-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:19:46 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
        by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jA8LJhFe019049;
        Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:19:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EZasY-00073h-9v; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:19:42 -0500
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:19:40 -0500
To: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#338203: 73 pkgs contain debhelper maintscript remnant (cruft?)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:40PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "This" refers to the #DEBHELPER# token.
OH.  Maybe I understand.  The maintscripts of the packages in my list
were probably initially dh_make templates, and the maintainers didn't
remove that comment.  The packages not in my list either have
maintscripts created from scratch by debhelper, or their maintainer
removed that comment.

Is that a consistent interpretation?

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to