* Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-05 03:24]: > Michael Stilkerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-09 11:37]: > > >> lintian has code specifically to recognize this situation. I'm not sure > >> why it isn't working. Can I see the rules and control file for this > >> package somewhere? > > > sure, see attachment. I think the problem came up when I started to use > > dpatch - if you look for dh_clean in the clean target you won't find it, > > since dh_clean is called from the clean-patched target that clean depends > > on. This is the solution suggested by the dpatch documentation. > > Thanks, sorry about the delay. I've just committed an improvement, making > lintian chase rules that clean, build-arch, and binary-arch depend on. It > only knows how to chase rules forward, so your example works but something > like: The new lintian release fixed the issue with debhelper, thanks. I still get the warning anyway, because I also call dpatch from one of the target clean depends on.
Could you please add dpatch to @rule_depends in checks/fields? I see that you look for some include lines including files from /usr/share/dpatch, but I do not include dpatch.make but call it directly (which is ok to do as to the dpatch manpage). -Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
