Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't know if we want to allow for that or not. I find the logic >> dubious, but dpatch supports that mode of operation. > I have to admit that I consider using a patch system in this way to be a > bug. I think we might want to upload with this check and see if there > are too many "false" positives. I'm okay with that. I just wanted to warn in advance, since I expect there will be at least some controversy over it (even though the check has also been requested by others). > OTOH, what might be more important would be to introduce checks for > other patch systems, but I fear I don't know enough about them to add > some checks (especially after seeing how much I didn't know about > dpatch...) Adding more tests for quilt is on my list, but behind various other things (such as Policy work). -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
