>>> I don't know if we want to allow for that or not. I find the logic >>> dubious, but dpatch supports that mode of operation. >> I have to admit that I consider using a patch system in this way to be a >> bug. I think we might want to upload with this check and see if there >> are too many "false" positives.
FWIW I give a +1 for this warning. IMO one shouldn't ship the changes from the patch in the .diff.gz too. Thats just wrong. Better would be to have a common patch/unpatch target defined in policy. And then the normal maintainer should follow the W (maybe upgrade to E unless NMU detected) and the NMUer can ignore it, ie run "foo patch" and then edit the stuff, so the NMU ends up in diff.gz (And jftr - I lost interest in that thread way before HE did) -- bye, Joerg Mal verlierst Du und mal gewinnen die anderen: Immer im Wechsel! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
