On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Given that this is an infrastructure change, I think this warrants a > version bump, and I'd like to propose that we change the version numbering > of Lintian at the same time. Currently, all we're ever doing is > incrementing the third version number of the package. Should we switch to > just using two versions; in other words, make the next version 1.24, the > version after that 1.25, and so forth? Then we can do major version bumps > for backward-incompatible changes or for major changes (such as, > hopefully, the summer work on tag classification). > > What do people think?
Yeah, I have nothing against bumping the 2nd version number. But I still think that the 3 part version number has its merits, so I'm currently against dropping the third part. Actually why not drop the 1? we really seem not intend to increase it any time ;) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
