Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yeah, I have nothing against bumping the 2nd version number. But I still > think that the 3 part version number has its merits, so I'm currently > against dropping the third part. Actually why not drop the 1? we really > seem not intend to increase it any time ;)
*laugh*. Okay, I'll keep the third part. My theory was that we'd bump the 1 to 2 when we incorporate a finer-grained tag classification system, since that's about the biggest change that I can imagine us doing for the forseeable future. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
