Jordà Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Other than that, there are still a few things, such as the Source/Ref > field, that could benefit from more discussion here in the list. If the > classification for tags without Ref[4] is to be used, how should it > compare to tags with Ref? Treat keywords as if they were "manuals"?
That at least was what I had in the back of my mind. > Also, how do you think --tags should interact with other options such as > --display-level? If it makes sense to use both options at the same time, > what should be the behaviour, display tags as an AND of all options? Or > does an OR make more sense? I agree with Frank here. AND makes the most sense to me. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
