Jordà Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then manpages and URLs probably need be classified too, which makes > sense. But how about manuals that are seldom referenced? Where do we > draw the line? This is the number of references for each manual: > > 215 policy > 27 devref > 18 doc-base > 13 fhs > 13 menu > 4 debconf-spec > 4 menu-policy > 4 perl-policy > 2 python-policy > 1 libpkg-guide > 1 lintian > > The first five manuals probably deserve to be identified as a "source", > but I'm not so sure about manuals with 4 or less references.
Maybe we should make a source classifier called other-policies and group together everything with fewer than 10 references until someone requests we split out one of them in particular? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
