Raphael Geissert <[email protected]> writes: > I don't know why I had the idea that it returned the return code of the > process. But taking a look at it again, I think we want && here, so that > 1 is returned only if none of the processes had to be SIGKILLed.
Good point. Fixed. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
