On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 19:46 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > It's possible I'm being overly picky here, but I have to admit that I'd > > prefer it if the test script and the changes to existing files as a > > result of issues found by the script were two commits rather than being > > bundled in to one. > > Do you have any special reason? I've nothing against doing it the way you > say, but by including both changes in the same commit it makes a clear > point as to why those changes were made and based on what.
Not that I can clearly describe, no, hence the prefix to the comment. It just "feels nicer" to me, but obviously ymm (and does :) v. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
