On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:30 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:06 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> Attached mbox replaces the hacks with a more meaningful replacement. > > > > Sadly the needs-info-missing test breaks :-/ > > > > t/scripts/needs-info-missing....ok 1/35# > > # changelog already defined but values don't match: > > # '' (Lintian/Collect/Source.pm) ne 'changelog-file' > > Does it really break? It should be a warning which is "fine" until the TODO > in the test script is done.
I think you might have missed adding that particular TODO to the script :-) The only one I can see is for supporting "foo or bar" style dependencies. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
