Ximin Luo <[email protected]> writes: > The text explaining the "or" part appears nowhere as well, when DEP5 > forces me to split the tri-license paragraph. The two situations are > equivalent, yet you're choosing different solutions for each!
That's a good point, and I think that's a bug in DEP5. > Alternatively, treat License stanzas as published licenses, and place > preamble information in License/Comment entries in File stanzas. This is > a much cleaner solution and what I had been interpreting DEP5 to mean. That's certainly a reasonable way of expressing that information. It's not what DEP5 currently says, though, and I'm fairly sure that's intentional (from following the original discussion). But it does seem like a reasonable change. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
