On Tuesday 16 June 2009, 14:51:45, Steven Shiau wrote: > > pls find following some patches to the live-intramfs code for initial > > Ubuntu (<=Jaunty) support.
> From http://aufs.sourceforge.net/ > Note: it becomes clear that "Aufs was rejected. Let's give it up." > According to Christoph Hellwig, linux rejects all union-type filesystems > but UnionMount. > Therefore in the future, maybe it's better that live-initramfs can support > unionfs-fuse, and unionmount. My 2 cents. Is unionmount already mature? Could it mount NFS too? How it handles whiteouts? It seems to me the cleaner solution in theory, but maybe it is just too young right now. -- ESC:wq -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
