Steven Shiau wrote: > From http://aufs.sourceforge.net/ > > Note: it becomes clear that "Aufs was rejected. Let's give it up." > According to Christoph Hellwig, linux rejects all union-type filesystems > but UnionMount.
i might be wrong, but isn't that why there's aufs2? > Therefore in the future, maybe it's better that live-initramfs can > support unionfs-fuse, and unionmount. even tough having unionfs-fuse optionally arround would be nice, i'd always prefere kernel based union (as long as it's possible/maintainable). it's way faster, and pulling in fuse into the initrd is quite much (for systems with low ram). -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [email protected] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
