Le 03/10/2012 12:48, Ben Armstrong a écrit :
On 10/03/2012 06:21 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
and my personal opinion is..
i've though long and many times about this, and yet could not come up
with a generic but suitable name. choosing 'medium' is suboptimal for
netboot/webboot, i really don't like that, but it's better by far than
image which almost always doesn't fit. 'medium' is not that catastrophic
for netboot/webboot users, and otherwise suitable. assuming nobody else
comes up with a perfect generic but suitable name, i'd go with 'medium'.
Agreed. Better to have a term more familiar to users here even if not
entirely accurate, than one that is only really meaningful to live-build
developers ('binary', which was initially my favourite, but after
discussion I conceded 'medium' is better).
Ben
I would like being able to use multiple media do get
{*.squashfs,*.ext2,*.dir} from. How should they be named ?
Ph. L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
