As far as I can see from the practical results of my builds, the modifications of the packages are different:

The live-build package i've built from anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-live/live-build.git/ produces uefi-bootable hybrid-isos only when


--bootloader grub-efi

is set. But I don't want to use grub.

--bootloader syslinux

will produce a iso-hybrid image without UEFI-Suport, that is only bootable in legacy/CSM mode.


In contrast, the Live-build- Package from Kali (http://http.kali.org/kali/pool/main/l/live-build/live-build_20151215kali3_all.deb) produces UEFI-bootable iso-hybrid Images with syslinux.

Is that correct, or have I overlooked something?

My build system is jessie, the target live-system too.


Am 22.09.2016 um 15:30 schrieb Machu Chukov:


Am 22.09.2016 um 15:20 schrieb Machu Chukov:

Thanks, works for me. Are there any important differences between http://http.kali.org/kali/pool/main/l/live-build/live-build_20151215kali3_all.deb and the package one can build from https://github.com/rescatux/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased_10 ? Both have the version number 5.0~a11-1.


respectively between the first and https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-live/live-build.git/ , where the UEFI-patch provided by adrian15 seems to have been applied.


Reply via email to