Hi debian-lsb, 1.) I have run the lsb-runtime-tests on i386 against unstable from 2003-10-16 and using kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686-smp version 2.4.22-3 and posted the results on the webpage at, http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
2.) Like I did for ia64 I made a color-coded annotated summary, http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/i386-20031016.tj.annotate.html I have also updated the ia64 annotated summary, http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/ia64-20030829.tj.annotate.html A few things have turned green due to the waivers we filed and got INT/TSDs on. 3.) diff'ing the ia64 tj report and the i386 tj report reveals a few things, Fail on ia64 but not i386 ========================= > /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/fwide/T.fwide 4 FAIL > /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/vfprintf/T.vfprintf 5 FAIL Unanalysed. These are glibc functions. > /tset/LSB.os/files/dev_tty/T.dev_tty 1 UNRESOLVED Unanalysed. > /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/mmap_P/T.mmap_P 29 FAIL > /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/mmap_P/T.mmap_P 34 FAIL > /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/munmap_P/T.munmap_P 4 FAIL Waiver/TSD (ia64 specific) PR#0022 Fail on i386 but not ia64 ========================= > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/times/T.times 4 FAIL > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/times/T.times 6 UNINITIATED > /tset/POSIX.os/procprim/fork/T.fork 5 UNRESOLVED Unanalysed. Fail on both(that we don't have waivers for) ============ > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 6 FAIL > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 7 FAIL > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 8 FAIL > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 9 FAIL Unanalysed. > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcgetattr/T.tcgetattr 1 FAIL > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcgetattr/T.tcgetattr 2 FAIL Unanalysed. This is a glibc function. Did not fail in Jeff's i386/woody and sarge testing. Jeff did you patch for this? > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/getlogin/T.getlogin 1 FAIL This one is supposedly dependent on how the tests are run. In this case I ssh'd into the system as vsx0 which is the recommended way to do it. I've also tried running tests from a linux virtual console(should work) and with `su - vsx0`(known to fail). This test needs some investigation. Any help with the above would be appreciated. I think some libc6 bugs needs to be filed once we understand why the tests are failing. Thanks, -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
