On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:53, Matt Taggart wrote: > Fail on ia64 but not i386 > ========================= > > /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/fwide/T.fwide 4 FAIL > > /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/vfprintf/T.vfprintf 5 FAIL > > Unanalysed. These are glibc functions. > > > /tset/LSB.os/files/dev_tty/T.dev_tty 1 UNRESOLVED > > Unanalysed.
I've been seeing this on all my test runs as well, and on i386. Weird. > Fail on i386 but not ia64 > ========================= > > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/times/T.times 4 FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/times/T.times 6 UNINITIATED > > /tset/POSIX.os/procprim/fork/T.fork 5 UNRESOLVED > > Unanalysed. I have not seen these failures in my test runs, at least not recently. > Fail on both(that we don't have waivers for) > ============ > > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 6 FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 7 FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 8 FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/c_iflag/T.c_iflag 9 FAIL > > Unanalysed. I get this on sarge, but not woody. > > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcgetattr/T.tcgetattr 1 FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcgetattr/T.tcgetattr 2 FAIL > > Unanalysed. This is a glibc function. Did not fail in Jeff's > i386/woody and sarge testing. Jeff did you patch for this? This does fail on sarge, but not woody. I do use a patched glibc on woody; the single patch actually comes from AJ, and appears to be a port of some SuSE fixes to glibc 2.2. The patch is here: http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/patches/woody/glibc_2.2.5-11.5/various-lsb-fixes-suse.dpatch.txt It's supposedly aimed at the following LSB tests: LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L-2 FAIL LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L-3 FAIL LSB.os/genuts/ftw/T.ftw-4 FAIL LSB.os/genuts/nftw/T.nftw-10 FAIL POSIX.os/procenv/sysconf/T.sysconf-10 FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/getlogin/T.getlogin 1 FAIL > > This one is supposedly dependent on how the tests are run. In this case I > ssh'd into the system as vsx0 which is the recommended way to do it. I've > also tried running tests from a linux virtual console(should work) and > with `su - vsx0`(known to fail). This test needs some investigation. I haven't been seeing this failure on either sarge or woody.
