On 2018-02-20 07:33:27, Brian May wrote:
> Any comments? Where should we go from here?
I'm not sure. The security team marked that as "no-dsa (minor issue)"
for jessie and stretch, and fixed in pycryptodome 3.4.11-1... Couldn't
we reuse the fixes from cryptodome to get this working properly? Or is
this what you say breaks API compatibility?
Maybe we just let this one slide? It's not as if ElGamal was a very
popular algo, is it?
a.
--
Au nom de l'état, la force s'appelle droit.
Au main de l'individu, elle s'appelle crime.
- Max Stirner
