Ola Lundqvist <o...@inguza.com> writes:
> This is what I think we should do.
> 1) Send a new DLA telling that the fix is only partial and not complete and
> in addtion that elgamal encryption is not supported by the library and
> should not be used.
> 2) Mark the CVE as no-dsa/ignored in the security database.
If so, do we update the DLA 1283-1 to remove the fixed status? I assume
we just have to update the entry in security-tracker/data/DLA/list?
In any case, it seems like a good plan. Unless there are any objections,
I will do this next Monday.
Brian May <b...@debian.org>