Hi LTS contributors, Recently I noticed that for a no-dsa (either for no-dsa or the stronger ignored) as explanation was started to be used e.g. "not used by any sponsor".
If LTS is meant as Debian project, then I would suggest not to start to use those formulations, which I think are fine for ELTS, which is a dedicated project not on Debian directly. Saying something is not DSA worthy or is going to be ignored, because it's not used by a LTS sponsor will give a signal to others that indeed, Debian LTS is not a generic Debian project. Just stick to "Minor issue" in such cases if something is not DSA worthy because the issue is minor, but do not make it depdendent on if a paying LTS sponsor is using it or not. Thanks for reading, Regards, Salvatore