Le Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:15:31PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing a écrit : > Hello, > > today I have commit the tags based on the suggested patch provided by > the debian-med project. > > The diff is appended at the end of the e-mail. > > The changes should hit the main vocabulary in a day or two.
Hi, I just had a look at the tagging interface and they seem to be already there :) After trying to use, I have a few extra questions: > +Tag: biology::emboss Any idea why the debian packages emboss and emboss-explorere are not available for tagging? > +Tag: field::biology:bioinformatics > +Tag: field::biology:molecular > +Tag: field::biology:structural Should we remove the field::biology tag when using one of its childs? For instance, if we use field::biology:molecular, will the package still show up in searches for field::biology? For field::biology:bioinformatics, I think that I agree with Steffen that bioinformatics is very vague. It could be replaced by sequence-analysis, although had we works-with::sequence we could use it in conjunction with use::analysis (and I still think that works-with:;sequence is not overspecialised, compared for instance to works-with::music-notation, or works-with::image:raster). Lastly, I really think that it would be great if maintainers of packages could easily subscribe to notification changes for the tagging of their packages. In our case where the maintainer is a mail list, it would greatly improve our ability to collaboratively maintain the tags. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wako, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
