Le Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:47:41AM +0200, Steffen Moeller a écrit : > We could have "works-with::structures", too. This has a nice ambiguity for, > e.g., software that addresses architecutral planning or so which also work > with 3D structures but not in the field::biology. I think I like that kind of > reuse.
Hi all, Actually, there is already a tag "works-with::3dmodel", maybe we can use it? Definitely, providing a works-with tag to our programs would be a great thing. For instance, all the packages for which I would have used a works-with::sequence if it were available now display the following sentence in the GoTagging interface: There is a 91% chance that a works-with::* tag is missing Whate a wise interface ;) Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wako, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
