On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
there is ClustalW 2.0.1 out since a few days. In the past we had always
used the ClustalX distribution and built two packages from there. The
current setup is focusing on treating the two separately. I personally
think that either is fine. Now, there are a few suprises.
a) ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/clustalw2/CHANGELOG says "Added
debian packaging files" but I had neither received any such info from
upstream nor have I found it in the clustal[wx].tar.gz.
Well, if there is no such dir in the tarball I'd consider it good news
because we do not need to teach upstream that this is not a good idea.
:)
b) the binary is called clustalw2 by default but somehow i feel that we
should keep the name without the "2". Other opinions?
If clustalw2 replaces clustalw I see no need for adding the version number
to the executable.
Any news about the license issues?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
