Dear Andreas, Until now, we haven't had advances on SIGAR packaging [1].
How should we proceed? Kind regards, Tatiana [1] https://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel.mentors/browse_thread/thread/163e37501dea0d7a?pli=1 On 25 March 2010 13:45, Tatiana Al-Chueyr <[email protected]>wrote: > Sorry, missing reference: > [1] > https://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel.mentors/browse_thread/thread/163e37501dea0d7a?pli=1 > > On 25 March 2010 13:44, Tatiana Al-Chueyr <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dear Andreas, >> >> On 23 March 2010 07:11, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to come back to the InVesalius packaging which depends >>> from SIGAR >> >> >> Thiago posted yesterday a message to the mailing list you proposed, >> regarding SIGAR packaging [1]. >> >> Should we have any advances in this subject, we´ll post to Debian-Med >> list...! >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Tatiana >> >> >>> . >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:25:23PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> > >>> > > Can we (Thiago) pack SIGAR oficially? >>> > >>> > Sure. That's the best thing you can do to speed InVesalius packaging >>> up. >>> >>> Is there any progress done to get an official sigar package? >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Andreas. >>> >>> PS: In case you do not remember the context of this question have a look >>> into the archive (second half of the mail): >>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2010/02/msg00056.html >>> >>> -- >>> http://fam-tille.de >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Tatiana Al-Chueyr >> > > > > -- > Tatiana Al-Chueyr > -- Tatiana Al-Chueyr
