Olivier Sallou wrote: > unfortunatly, GWT is not my only concern. > This is the first one, but there is also SmartGWT which has many > dependencies (GWT Tools and others...)
Right, it looks like it won't be your only problem :) > Though, independently from GWT link for Biomaj, I could help maintaining > it in the future. About GWT2.2, I CCed James Page who took over maintenance of Eucalyptus Java deps when I left Canonical. James, I seem to remember new versions of Eucalyptus would depend on GWT2 and that we would have to package that. Is that still true ? > Le 2/17/11 12:58 PM, Steffen Möller a écrit : >> On 02/16/2011 06:00 PM, Scott Christley wrote: >>> The web interface will have togo to non-free 'cause it depends on >>> several GWT libraries which are not packaged for Debian so we need to >>> provide the Jar files with the softs. >> I once sponsored backported core gwt packages from Ubuntu to Debian. >> They are most likely in the pkg-eucalyptus repository. I'd >> need to investigate. I put the original maintainer Thierry on the CC, >> who might (but fairly likely may not) be interested in a >> respective update to the 2.2. version of the GWT. >> >> Olivier, what parts of the GWT are you using? And, if we can produce >> the jars within Debian/Ubuntu, and if can build packages for >> it, would you then possibly prepared to maintain that GWT-2.2 package? >> I'd prepare myself (in sync with Thierry) a respective >> update for the GWT-1.6 currently in the archive to not break existing >> installations too much. >> >> Many greetings >> Steffen -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Ubuntu core developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
