for javascript dependencies, gbrowse use the latest ones. I can't consider using the debian ones as I do not know exact gbrowse requirements for those libraries. All I know is the current version in use as they include it.

One possible thing would be to upgrade prototype/scriptaculous to latest versions in debian repository.
Should I use maintainers to upgrade it?

Olivier


On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:51:52PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:

>  I use latest lintian and man pages are present in my package, I checked.
>  Did you apply the patch?
Uhmm, not my day - old patch.:-(

>  I added many of the man pages with the patch
While it is perfectly valid to add the man pages via a patch (especially
if you plan to foreward this patch upstream) I would consider it way
more usual to move all manpages written by a Debian Maintainer to
debian/*.1.  So what you are doing is not really wrong but might not
be the best idea (= just a hint, feel free to keep it as is).


>  Lintian still show 3 missing man pages and some man issues in a few.
>  Fixing man issue may be difficult as doc is extracted from perl files
>  automatically (perl2mod I think or something like that).
If lintian is simply nitpicking and you would like to provide the
manpages that way you might consider debian/lintian-overrides to make
sure these warnings will not hide other problems.  With lintian 2.4.3
I get in addition to the manpage issues:

W: gbrowse: embedded-javascript-library 
usr/share/gbrowse2/htdocs/js/prototype.js
W: gbrowse: embedded-javascript-library 
usr/share/gbrowse2/htdocs/js/scriptaculous.js

As lintian suggests you might consider making the package dependant from
libjs-prototype and libjs-scriptaculous and add debian/links width

usr/share/javascript/prototype/prototype.js             
usr/share/gbrowse2/htdocs/js/prototype.js
usr/share/javascript/scriptaculous/scriptaculous.js     
usr/share/gbrowse2/htdocs/js/scriptaculous.js

(Just did something similar with python-cogent).


>  I gonna move bins as requested
I did it before I wrote my last mail.

Thanks for your packaging work (and sorry for the confusion I might have
caused when inspecting old code).  Charles, could your please have a
look if you consider it ready for sponsering?

Kind regards

        Andreas.

-- http://fam-tille.de
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]


Reply via email to