Hi Charles,
I have a question regarding your work:
1) How did you find license issues ? (manual parse of all files?)
2) Regarding symbol file, how did you generate it ? (could help for
further work)
Thanks
Olivier
Le 3/19/11 7:39 AM, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:32:05PM +0100, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
I could also create (sub)binary packages with package name libbioseq
and libbioali, but I don't think it is acceptable to use several
packages names (not like squizz-xxx). My control file would have
source package squizz and binary packages squizz, libbioali,
libbioseq
Hi Olivier,
I think that as long as no other package depend on the bioali and bioseq
libraries, the current situation is sufficient.
I had a look and added a symbols so that the dependancy on libsquizz goes
through the shlibs:Depends substitution variable.
Unfortunately, I also found a non-free file. I think that our archive
administrators enforce the same policy for software code and for data.
Therefore, you have the choice between:
- Delete the non-free file and disable the regression test(s) where
it is used.
- Upload the package to the non-free section of the Debian archive,
instead of Debian proper.
- Discuss with Upstream so that he finds a free replacement.
By the way, perhaps you can also report Upstream that the man pages that he
installs in the man5 directory still have ‘1’ as a section in their .TH line.
Correcting this would simplify their installation. Also, I see that you wrote a
manpage for squizz, but there is one from upstream as well, that you might have
overlooked.
Have a nice week-end,
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
